Search for: "Strong v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co." Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 3:23 pm by Gene Killian
Sussex Mutual Insurance Co., 56 N.J. 383 (1970), a classic “bad facts make bad law” case. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 10:23 am by Gene Killian
Sussex Mutual Insurance Co., 56 N.J. 383 (1970), a classic “bad facts make bad law” case. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 314 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), where no support is to be found. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
Urban Health Plan, Inc., 256 AD2d 307 (2nd Dept. 1998); Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
The PTAB analyzed a series of such motions in the final written decision for Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 6:14 am by Chip Merlin
Overall, Merlin has been a strong advocate for policyholders in the insurance industry and has been critical of claims handling practices that he believes are unfair or abusive. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
As such, Pennsylvania litigators will have to continue to rely upon the various trial court opinions, and the reasoning contained therein, to advocate their positions.Forum SelectionThe Superior Court issued an opinion upholding Liberty Mutual Insurance Group's forum selection clause in the post-Koken case of O'Hara v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]